<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QT’s move to LGPL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.engage-encore.com/index.php/2009/01/14/qt-move-to-lgpl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.engage-encore.com/index.php/2009/01/14/qt-move-to-lgpl/</link>
	<description>Making Software Applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:00:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jethro Grassie</title>
		<link>http://blog.engage-encore.com/index.php/2009/01/14/qt-move-to-lgpl/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Jethro Grassie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.engage-encore.com/?p=131#comment-111</guid>
		<description>@Douglas, I did not say it was not possible to develop open-source software to non-Linux platforms using QT previously.
My point was that if you wanted/needed to develop commercial closed source applications for non-Linux platforms you were required to purchase pretty expensive licences for each target platform.
This barrier is now removed with the move to LGPL across all QT targets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Douglas, I did not say it was not possible to develop open-source software to non-Linux platforms using QT previously.<br />
My point was that if you wanted/needed to develop commercial closed source applications for non-Linux platforms you were required to purchase pretty expensive licences for each target platform.<br />
This barrier is now removed with the move to LGPL across all QT targets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://blog.engage-encore.com/index.php/2009/01/14/qt-move-to-lgpl/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.engage-encore.com/?p=131#comment-110</guid>
		<description>You are inaccurate at saying that with the previous license was not possible to develop open-source software to non-Linux platforms. The thing is that with the previous license all projects using the GPL version of Qt must be released under GPL license also. Now with the LGPL projects can do or not release their code as open-source, but is still necessary to publish modifications on Qt code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are inaccurate at saying that with the previous license was not possible to develop open-source software to non-Linux platforms. The thing is that with the previous license all projects using the GPL version of Qt must be released under GPL license also. Now with the LGPL projects can do or not release their code as open-source, but is still necessary to publish modifications on Qt code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

